AI visibility tools compared: Otterly, Peec AI, ZipTie and manual tracking

Four AI visibility tools compared side by side on platform coverage and use, plus the manual route that proves the same thing without a subscription.

← back to home

AI visibility // comparison
tools-comparison.md

$ compare --tools=4 --manual=1

AI visibility tools compared: Otterly, Peec AI, ZipTie and manual tracking

Four tools measure whether your business appears in AI answers: Otterly AI, Peec AI, ZipTie and LLMrefs. They differ mainly in which platforms they cover and what they focus on, and for a first measurement a spreadsheet with a fixed set of questions is enough. This piece sets out all the options side by side. We don't sell any of these tools and haven't tested them ourselves over the long term; the comparison rests on the coverage the makers themselves publish.

DD DataDrift Digital 3 September 2026 4 min

Anyone who wants to know whether their business gets mentioned in ChatGPT, Perplexity or Google's AI Overviews needs a measurement tool. The choice is between four specialised tools and a spreadsheet with discipline. Which of the five fits depends on how many questions you track, how many brands you measure and which platforms matter for your customers.

01 / the instrumentWhy you choose a measurement tool first

Without a fixed measurement, any statement about AI visibility is just an opinion. Answers differ per session and per phrasing, so only a fixed set of questions that you repeat at fixed intervals produces an outcome that still tells you something next month. How that measuring stick works is covered in how you measure AI visibility; this piece is about the tools you use to run that measurement.

For clarity: this is a young corner of the field. In the Netherlands, this category still gets few searches (according to NL search data from DataForSEO, August 2026, around 40 to 70 searches a month for terms like ai visibility tool and ai seo tools), and the tools themselves are young. So expect coverage and features to keep shifting, and check with the maker what applies today.

02 / the comparisonFour tools and the spreadsheet side by side

The differences aren't in what the tools promise, but in which platforms they read and what their reporting focuses on. This is the coverage as published by the makers (as of August 2026):

OptionCoversFocuses onBest for
Otterly AIChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI OverviewsYour share of AI answers alongside competitors' (share of AI voice)Anyone who wants to see the competitive comparison across the three big platforms
Peec AIChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, CopilotMonitoring across many platforms at once, at scaleAnyone who wants broad coverage, including Claude and Copilot, or tracks multiple brands
ZipTieGoogle AI Overviews, ChatGPT, PerplexityBrand mentions and the sentiment around themAnyone who mainly wants to know how the brand is talked about
LLMrefsLinking SEO keywords to AI visibilitySeeing what your existing keywords do in AI answersAnyone who already has an SEO keyword list and wants to extend it
Manual tracking (spreadsheet)Any platform you open yourselfFixed set of questions, one measurement point a month, tick boxes per platformA first stage, one brand, a manageable number of questions

We deliberately leave out prices: they change fast in this segment and weren't in our source. And once more the honesty that a comparison calls for: we haven't tested any of the four in production over the long term. What's written here is the published coverage, not a verdict from practice.

03 / the zero optionWhy manual tracking is a legitimate choice

The spreadsheet isn't a cut-down version of a tool, but the same measurement without a subscription. You fix your set of questions, open each platform, note per question whether you appear, and repeat that every month at the same point. How to set up such a first round in half an hour is covered in how to check whether your business appears in ChatGPT.

A tool speeds up your measurement; the measuring stick is what makes it reliable.

What manual tracking doesn't give you is scale and history without effort. Twenty-five questions across four platforms is half a day a month; two hundred questions across five platforms for three brands is no longer manual work. That's where the tools' territory begins.

04 / the choiceWhere to start, and when to switch

Our advice is simple: start with manual tracking and a fixed measuring stick, and only switch to a tool once the number of questions, platforms or brands makes manual tracking unsustainable. That way you first learn what a meaningful question and a meaningful outcome look like, and only then do you buy in a targeted way rather than on the promise of a dashboard.

If you do choose a tool straight away, choose based on the platforms where your customers search, not the longest feature list. A B2B audience that works a lot with Claude and Copilot gets little from coverage of ChatGPT alone; anyone who mainly needs to be found on Google should look first at AI Overviews coverage.

When choosing, watch for two practical points, whichever brand is on the box. First: can you export your measurement series, so your history travels with you if you later switch or go back to the spreadsheet. Second: can you enter your own set of questions instead of a generated one, because the measurement is only comparable to your baseline measurement if the questions stay the same.

And for anyone who'd rather not run the measurement themselves at all: that's also available as a service, including a report and points for improvement. What such an outsourced baseline measurement involves is covered in what an AI visibility scan is. For anyone whose customers don't come in through online search or AI answers, the opposite applies: none of these five options are worth your time, and that's the most useful takeaway from this piece.

Frequently asked questions
What does an AI visibility tool do?+
Such a tool periodically runs a fixed set of search queries through AI platforms like ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews, and tracks whether and how your brand appears in the answers. Reporting differs per tool: from competitive comparison (share of AI voice) to brand mentions with sentiment.
Which AI visibility tool is the best?+
There's no honest single answer to that. The tools differ mainly in covered platforms and focus: Otterly AI on competitive comparison, Peec AI on broad coverage including Claude and Copilot, ZipTie on mentions and sentiment, LLMrefs on the link with SEO keywords. Choose based on the platforms where your customers search; we haven't tested them ourselves over the long term.
Can I measure AI visibility without a tool?+
Yes. A spreadsheet with a fixed set of questions, a fixed definition of visible and one measurement point a month delivers the same evidential value as a tool, just without automation. For a first stage with one brand and a manageable number of questions, that's the logical starting point.
Which platforms should the measurement cover as a minimum?+
The platforms where your target customer actually searches. For a broad picture, that's ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews; if your audience works a lot with Claude or Copilot, those belong too. Coverage your customers don't use only adds report pages.
How often should you measure AI visibility?+
Monthly, with the same questions, the same platforms and the same definition of visible as in the first measurement. Measuring more often mainly adds noise, because AI answers move per session; measuring less often makes the link between your work and the outcome invisible.
baseline measurement · fixed price · no obligations

Would you rather know straight away where you stand, without comparing tools yourself?

The AI visibility scan

We measure, using a fixed set of search queries, where you do and don't appear in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI Overviews, and who's there now. One report, €295, fully offset against Op de Kaart. Even without a follow-up, you keep the report and know where you stand.

→ Request the scan

This text was produced with AI assistance and checked and approved by a human before publication.