AI visibility tools compared: Otterly, Peec AI, ZipTie and manual tracking
Four AI visibility tools compared side by side on platform coverage and use, plus the manual route that proves the same thing without a subscription.
Lees dit in het Nederlands →$ compare --tools=4 --manual=1
AI visibility tools compared: Otterly, Peec AI, ZipTie and manual tracking
Four tools measure whether your business appears in AI answers: Otterly AI, Peec AI, ZipTie and LLMrefs. They differ mainly in which platforms they cover and what they focus on, and for a first measurement a spreadsheet with a fixed set of questions is enough. This piece sets out all the options side by side. We don't sell any of these tools and haven't tested them ourselves over the long term; the comparison rests on the coverage the makers themselves publish.
Anyone who wants to know whether their business gets mentioned in ChatGPT, Perplexity or Google's AI Overviews needs a measurement tool. The choice is between four specialised tools and a spreadsheet with discipline. Which of the five fits depends on how many questions you track, how many brands you measure and which platforms matter for your customers.
01 / the instrumentWhy you choose a measurement tool first
Without a fixed measurement, any statement about AI visibility is just an opinion. Answers differ per session and per phrasing, so only a fixed set of questions that you repeat at fixed intervals produces an outcome that still tells you something next month. How that measuring stick works is covered in how you measure AI visibility; this piece is about the tools you use to run that measurement.
For clarity: this is a young corner of the field. In the Netherlands, this category still gets few searches (according to NL search data from DataForSEO, August 2026, around 40 to 70 searches a month for terms like ai visibility tool and ai seo tools), and the tools themselves are young. So expect coverage and features to keep shifting, and check with the maker what applies today.
02 / the comparisonFour tools and the spreadsheet side by side
The differences aren't in what the tools promise, but in which platforms they read and what their reporting focuses on. This is the coverage as published by the makers (as of August 2026):
| Option | Covers | Focuses on | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Otterly AI | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews | Your share of AI answers alongside competitors' (share of AI voice) | Anyone who wants to see the competitive comparison across the three big platforms |
| Peec AI | ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot | Monitoring across many platforms at once, at scale | Anyone who wants broad coverage, including Claude and Copilot, or tracks multiple brands |
| ZipTie | Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity | Brand mentions and the sentiment around them | Anyone who mainly wants to know how the brand is talked about |
| LLMrefs | Linking SEO keywords to AI visibility | Seeing what your existing keywords do in AI answers | Anyone who already has an SEO keyword list and wants to extend it |
| Manual tracking (spreadsheet) | Any platform you open yourself | Fixed set of questions, one measurement point a month, tick boxes per platform | A first stage, one brand, a manageable number of questions |
We deliberately leave out prices: they change fast in this segment and weren't in our source. And once more the honesty that a comparison calls for: we haven't tested any of the four in production over the long term. What's written here is the published coverage, not a verdict from practice.
03 / the zero optionWhy manual tracking is a legitimate choice
The spreadsheet isn't a cut-down version of a tool, but the same measurement without a subscription. You fix your set of questions, open each platform, note per question whether you appear, and repeat that every month at the same point. How to set up such a first round in half an hour is covered in how to check whether your business appears in ChatGPT.
A tool speeds up your measurement; the measuring stick is what makes it reliable.
What manual tracking doesn't give you is scale and history without effort. Twenty-five questions across four platforms is half a day a month; two hundred questions across five platforms for three brands is no longer manual work. That's where the tools' territory begins.
04 / the choiceWhere to start, and when to switch
Our advice is simple: start with manual tracking and a fixed measuring stick, and only switch to a tool once the number of questions, platforms or brands makes manual tracking unsustainable. That way you first learn what a meaningful question and a meaningful outcome look like, and only then do you buy in a targeted way rather than on the promise of a dashboard.
If you do choose a tool straight away, choose based on the platforms where your customers search, not the longest feature list. A B2B audience that works a lot with Claude and Copilot gets little from coverage of ChatGPT alone; anyone who mainly needs to be found on Google should look first at AI Overviews coverage.
When choosing, watch for two practical points, whichever brand is on the box. First: can you export your measurement series, so your history travels with you if you later switch or go back to the spreadsheet. Second: can you enter your own set of questions instead of a generated one, because the measurement is only comparable to your baseline measurement if the questions stay the same.
And for anyone who'd rather not run the measurement themselves at all: that's also available as a service, including a report and points for improvement. What such an outsourced baseline measurement involves is covered in what an AI visibility scan is. For anyone whose customers don't come in through online search or AI answers, the opposite applies: none of these five options are worth your time, and that's the most useful takeaway from this piece.
What does an AI visibility tool do?+
Which AI visibility tool is the best?+
Can I measure AI visibility without a tool?+
Which platforms should the measurement cover as a minimum?+
How often should you measure AI visibility?+
Would you rather know straight away where you stand, without comparing tools yourself?
The AI visibility scan
We measure, using a fixed set of search queries, where you do and don't appear in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI Overviews, and who's there now. One report, €295, fully offset against Op de Kaart. Even without a follow-up, you keep the report and know where you stand.
This text was produced with AI assistance and checked and approved by a human before publication.