Work · Own brand

Driftzz runs on our system

The site, the blog, bookings, follow-up and reporting run without hands-on work. Bram spends his time on campaigns and client relationships, not on admin.

The brand itself is at driftzz.nl. That's where the results are; this is the system underneath.

Driftzz is not a client. It is a second brand of the same company: Bram's marketing agency, with DataDrift as the builder behind it. We'd rather show what we built ourselves than borrow a case study.

This is not a client project that we're retelling. It is our own system, running on a real domain with real traffic, and what's measurable about it is set out below with the measurement alongside it, including where the figure isn't ours.

Published · updated

The system

What runs daily

Four parts. Not what's under the bonnet, but what a business owner notices from it.

The shop window

The site tells the offering, in the brand's own house style. Anyone looking for a sector or a service arrives on a page about that.

The diary

Anyone who wants a conversation picks a slot themselves. The invitation with the video link is there straight away, and no email exchange is involved.

The postman

Every enquiry comes in with brand, source and owner attached. It lands with the right person before anyone has touched it.

The file

For every conversation, a briefing about who's on the other side is ready in advance. No one has to read through a site the night before.

The system has been running since 16 August 2026. The booking chain serves two brands from one flow and keeps track of which request belongs to which brand. The blog runs on a custom theme on our own server.

It's young. What the chain itself has carried through will be added here once it exists, not before. What has already been measured is set out further down, with the measurement alongside it.

The extraction

What was in his head, and how that became a system

This is the part that's about our method rather than about Driftzz. A way of working that exists only in someone's head can't be handed over and can't run automatically. So we take it out.

  1. What was in his head

    The order in which he builds a campaign. When he runs an advertisement. Which conversations he does and doesn't take on. How he writes up a result so a client understands it. None of that was written down anywhere.

  2. How it came out

    Recording what he already says, and putting it in order. Not inventing something new: the method already existed, it just wasn't on paper anywhere.

  3. What it became

    The recorded admission requirement became a rule in the form. The fixed structure of a result became a page template. The follow-up order became a chain that leaves nothing behind.

One example, written out

Bram only works with businesses that follow up on a request within a day. Advertising for someone who calls back three days later costs money and delivers nothing. That rule sat in his head and he applied it in conversations.

It now sits on the contact page, and in the place in the system where enquiries come in. Whoever reads it and thinks “we won't manage that”, drops out on their own. That's not a filter someone has to operate: it's the same rule, written down once.

The figures

Three numbers, and where they come from

We don't publish a number without the measurement behind it. So for each figure, it states what it measures, how it was measured, on what date, and whose figure it is.

7,1out of 100 · 2 of 4 components in the score · 28-8-2026

Our own TAZM score: what share of our own search market we own, on a scale of 0 to 100. The average of 2 of the 4 components; the other 2 don't count towards this figure.

How measured
We asked an AI model a question 160 times, spread across four models, plus 30 searches in Google including the AI summaries at the top. Every question was actually asked. For one of the four models, the answer didn't come back readable, so that model carries no score; why is explained on the evidence page. Measured on datadriftdigital.nl, with the same list of questions a client would receive.
Reference date
28 August 2026
Whose data
From us. This is DataDrift Digital measured with its own instrument.

The full measurement is on our evidence page

5.800sign-ups · one campaign by Driftzz for The Vital 5 · 10-8-2026

Sign-ups from one advertising campaign that Driftzz ran for The Vital 5, on a €1,113 ad budget.

How measured
Read straight from the ad account itself, not from a report: one campaign, one market, click-through rate 8.86%. Period March 2025 through August 2026.
Reference date
10 August 2026
Whose data
From Driftzz and its client, not from us. We built the layer underneath: the site, the chain and the place where a request ends up.

Driftzz publishes the case itself

€ 0,19per sign-up · the same Driftzz campaign · 10-8-2026

What one sign-up in that same campaign cost in ad budget. Not per person reached and not per client: per sign-up.

How measured
Same ad account, same campaign, same period. It's the best-performing campaign for that client; in the Netherlands, costs within the same portfolio ranged between €1.58 and €6.44 per sign-up.
Reference date
10 August 2026
Whose data
From Driftzz and its client, not from us. It's an advertising result, not a system result.

Driftzz publishes the case itself

One figure is ours, two are Driftzz's and its client's. They're shown together because they show what becomes measurable once the system underneath is running, not because they're all our performance.

What is not stated here: how many bookings have gone through the chain. That figure switches on at five real bookings and not before: with one you're describing an event, with five a pattern. Current status: zero of five.

Evidence

It's there, and it's there to see

Everything below is public. None of it needs to be taken on our word.

  • driftzz.nl, the site that came out of this build: 27 routes, in the brand's own house style, not in ours.
  • driftzz.nl/resultaten, the cases Driftzz publishes itself, each with its own page template that came out of the extraction.
  • Vital5: Driftzz counts 7,515 sign-ups there over eighteen months; the 5,800 above comes from the best-performing campaign within that same series. Their campaign result; here it counts as proof that the template gets filled.
  • Mangia Pizza: 61,536 people reached with one video. That's also Driftzz's figure, not ours.
  • blog.driftzz.nl, our own blog on our own server, with our own theme. Writing a post is the only manual work left; the rest of the chain is already in place.

Whatever figures appear on those pages belong to Driftzz. What we built is the layer underneath: the site, the chain and the place it all ends up.

Frequently asked questions

About these figures

How do you measure this?

Differently per figure, and that's stated with each figure. The TAZM score of 7.1 comes from 160 AI measurements across four models plus 30 Google measurements on our own questionnaire, reference date 28 August 2026. It's the same measurement a client would get, carried out on our own domain. The 5,800 sign-ups and the €0.19 per sign-up were read directly from the advertising account itself and not from a report; they belong to Driftzz and their client, not to us. What we don't measure, we don't publish, and anything measured on a different date doesn't silently count towards it: the 7.1 is the average of the two components from that one round on 28 August 2026.

Is this realistic for my business?

The figures no, the system yes. One advertising campaign in one market predicts nothing about your niche, and anyone who promises you otherwise isn't measuring. What is transferable is the structure underneath: a site that tells the offering, a diary that fills itself, an enquiry that arrives with source and owner attached, and a briefing that's already in place before the conversation. That's been running here since 16 August 2026, and it runs on our end without hands-on involvement. Whether it delivers anything for you, we won't know until we've measured it at your end.

What does something like this cost?

All amounts charged by DataDrift Digital are published on our pricing page, and this is the short version: the AI visibility scan costs €695 once and is deductible, AI visibility on an ongoing basis is €995 per month with a minimum of 3 months, and a Sprint that resolves one bottleneck lies between €2,500 and €7,500 one-off for the build, at a fixed amount upfront, plus ongoing management from €295 per month for as long as the system runs with us. All amounts exclude VAT. What Driftzz charges its clients isn't on this site: that's a separate brand with its own offering, and it prices itself.

Curious what this would mean for your business?

Start where we started too: with a measurement. Free, you'll receive the system diagnostic by email, and nobody will call you. Measuring, not scoring. You'll be given a record of what was measured, not a report card.

Take the free scan